UMA ANÁLISE SOBRE OS IMPACTOS SOCIAIS PROPORCIONADOS PELO DESENVOLVIMENTO E DIFUSÃO DE TECNOLOGIAS ASSISTIVAS
Barra lateral de artigos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
As Tecnologias Assistivas (TAs) têm desempenhado papel fundamental na promoção da inclusão, autonomia e qualidade de vida, mas seus impactos sociais ainda carecem de sistematização. Nesse sentido, este artigo objetiva mensurar, classificar e priorizar os efeitos psicossociais, econômicos e as barreiras à adoção de TAs. Foram aplicadas as diretrizes PRISMA para análise de 20 artigos, mapeando stakeholders e codificando atributos de impacto. Os resultados indicam que os aspectos psicossociais, em especial a valorização social e a participação, foram os mais relevantes, enquanto fatores econômicos e de equidade de acesso permanecem como desafios pouco explorados. Conclui-se que o framework proposto constitui uma ferramenta eficaz para apoiar decisões estratégicas em políticas públicas, desenvolvimento tecnológico e práticas interdisciplinares voltadas à adoção e difusão de TAs.
Detalhes do artigo
Referências
ALDAWOOD, A.; HIND, D.; RUSHTON, S. et al. Theories, models and frameworks to understand barriers to the provision of mobility-assistive technologies: a scoping review. BMJ Open, v. 14, n. 5, 2024. Disponível em:
ANDREASSEN, M.; BORGESTIG, M.; HEMMINGSSON, H. The psychosocial impact of eye-gaze assistive technology on everyday life of children and adults. Annals of Medicine, v. 56, n. 1, 2024. Disponível em:
ASGHAR, I.; CANG, S.; YU, H. An empirical study on assistive technology supported travel and tourism for the people with dementia. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, v. 15, n. 8, p. 933-944, 2020.
BALASUBRAMANIAN, G. V.; BEANEY, P.; CHAMBERS, R. Digital personal assistants are smart ways for assistive technology to aid the health and wellbeing of patients and carers. BMC Geriatrics, v. 21, n. 1, 2021.
BORGESTIG, M. et al. The impact of eye-gaze controlled computer on communication and functional independence in children and young people with complex needs: a multicenter intervention study. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, v. 24, n. 8, p. 511-524, 2021.
COOK, A. M.; POLGAR, J. M. Assistive technologies: principles and practice. 4. ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2014.
COOK, E. J. et al. Exploring the factors that influence the decision to adopt and engage with an integrated assistive telehealth and telecare service in Cambridgeshire, UK. BMC Health Services Research, v. 16, n. 1, 2016.
DE JESUS, P. A. C.; LOURENÇO, J. W.; NARA, E. O. B.; CANCIGLIERI JUNIOR, O.; SCHAEFER, J. L. An algorithm-based approach to map and analyze the impacts of assistive technologies on the systemic players. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (ICIST), 2024.
DESMOND, D. et al. Assistive technology and people: a position paper from the first global research, innovation and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, v. 13, n. 5, p. 437-444, 2018.
DILGER, E.-M. et al. Impact of contextual factors on the perceived participation of people with multiple sclerosis and gait impairment using mobility assistive devices: a qualitative analysis. Health Expectations, v. 27, n. 5, 2024.
FREEMAN, R. E. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman, 1984.
GARCÍA, T. P. et al. A framework for a new approach to empower users through low-cost and do-it-yourself assistive technology. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 18, n. 6, 2021.
GREENHALGH, T. et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, v. 17, n. 11, p. e367, 2015.
HERLACHE-PRETZER, E. et al. The impact of service dogs on engagement in occupation among females with mobility impairments: a qualitative descriptive study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 14, n. 6, 2017.
HERSH, M.; JOHNSON, M. On modelling assistive technology systems: part I – modelling framework. Technology and Disability, v. 20, n. 3, p. 193-215, 2008.
HOLTHE, T.; HALVORSRUD, L.; LUND, A. Digital assistive technology to support everyday living in community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Clinical Interventions in Aging, v. 17, p. 519-544, 2022.
JIMÉNEZ, E.; ORDÓÑEZ, F. A pilot study of the psychosocial impact of low-cost assistive technology for sexual functioning in people with acquired brain injury. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 18, n. 7, 2021.
KEMP, A. H.; FISHER, Z. Wellbeing, whole health and societal transformation: theoretical insights and practical applications. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, v. 11, 2022.
LAYTON, N. A.; STEEL, E. J. "An environment built to include rather than exclude me": creating inclusive environments for human well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 12, n. 9, p. 11146-11162, 2015..
MCNICHOLL, A.; DESMOND, D.; GALLAGHER, P. Feeling valued: the interplay of assistive technology and identity. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, v. 19, n. 7, p. 2580-2591, 2024
MOHER, D. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, v. 6, n. 7, p. e1000097, 2009.
MOXHAM, L. et al. The social determinants of health, mental health and resilience: an evidence-based framework. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, v. 26, n. 3-4, p. 112-118, 2019.
SABOROWSKI, M.; KOLLAK, I. How social science can contribute to assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, v. 10, n. 1, p. 23-31, 2015.
SCHICKTANZ, S. et al. AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies. Frontiers in Genetics, v. 14, 2023
SRIRAM, V.; JENKINSON, C.; PETERS, M. Carers using assistive technology in dementia care at home: a mixed methods study. BMC Geriatrics, v. 22, n. 1, 2022.
VERDONCK, M.; WILES, L.; BROOME, K. Lived experience of using assistive technology for sandy beach based leisure for Australian people with mobility limitations. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, v. 19, n. 4, p. 1568-1578, 2024
YU, S. et al. Factors influencing utilisation of assistive devices by the elderly in China: a community-based cross-sectional study. Public Health, v. 213, p. 12-18, 2022.
YU, S. et al. Factors influencing utilisation of assistive devices by the elderly in China: a community-based cross-sectional study. Public Health, v. 213, p. 12-18, 2022